<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: F100 Social Media Study Result</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalperspectiveblog.com/2009/08/02/f100-social-media-study-result/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalperspectiveblog.com/2009/08/02/f100-social-media-study-result/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 07:23:15 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tony Berkman</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalperspectiveblog.com/2009/08/02/f100-social-media-study-result/comment-page-1/#comment-6461</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Berkman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 01:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalperspectiveblog.com/?p=393#comment-6461</guid>
		<description>Results make sense as the ease of use of twitter compared to a blog post creates a lower barrier for corporations to engage stakeholders.  The challenge is with 140 characters only so much can be done.    

Twitter is a tactic that needs to be used in combination with corporate blogs,  and other web touch points, that result in driving a particular outcome -- whether that be increased online user to user support,  engagement and excitement around a specific service or to deliver a branding message and meaning across multiple channels.

For many of the F100 fear dominates their attitude towards the use of freeing their brand in the social media space.  Blogs are &quot;corporate like&quot;,  twitter accounts are &quot;uptight&quot;,  and there is no integrated strategy that leverages the power of these networks to enable brands to really listen to what customers are saying about them, engage where appropriate (it isn&#039;t always) and deliver meaningful value.

Many F100 execs believe they own their brand.   And it isn&#039;t only older CEOs that feel this way.  Many CMOs feel that the message should come from them and the employees of the company should not be liberated. The fact is, employees and other stakeholders are already liberated to speak using the myriad tools that new technologies provide them.    

Those companies that don&#039;t open their brand up will not be here for the mid-term.   Paradigm shifts occur at the edges.  When they occur, everyone goes to zero.   You either adapt to the realities or end up with a shoddy brand, lower sales, limping along into the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Results make sense as the ease of use of twitter compared to a blog post creates a lower barrier for corporations to engage stakeholders.  The challenge is with 140 characters only so much can be done.    </p>
<p>Twitter is a tactic that needs to be used in combination with corporate blogs,  and other web touch points, that result in driving a particular outcome &#8212; whether that be increased online user to user support,  engagement and excitement around a specific service or to deliver a branding message and meaning across multiple channels.</p>
<p>For many of the F100 fear dominates their attitude towards the use of freeing their brand in the social media space.  Blogs are &#8220;corporate like&#8221;,  twitter accounts are &#8220;uptight&#8221;,  and there is no integrated strategy that leverages the power of these networks to enable brands to really listen to what customers are saying about them, engage where appropriate (it isn&#8217;t always) and deliver meaningful value.</p>
<p>Many F100 execs believe they own their brand.   And it isn&#8217;t only older CEOs that feel this way.  Many CMOs feel that the message should come from them and the employees of the company should not be liberated. The fact is, employees and other stakeholders are already liberated to speak using the myriad tools that new technologies provide them.    </p>
<p>Those companies that don&#8217;t open their brand up will not be here for the mid-term.   Paradigm shifts occur at the edges.  When they occur, everyone goes to zero.   You either adapt to the realities or end up with a shoddy brand, lower sales, limping along into the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Bartmann</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalperspectiveblog.com/2009/08/02/f100-social-media-study-result/comment-page-1/#comment-6431</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bartmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 15:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalperspectiveblog.com/?p=393#comment-6431</guid>
		<description>Excellent site, keep up the good work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent site, keep up the good work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radar Digital &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Twitter é mídia social preferida das empresas do Fortune 100</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalperspectiveblog.com/2009/08/02/f100-social-media-study-result/comment-page-1/#comment-6406</link>
		<dc:creator>Radar Digital &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Twitter é mídia social preferida das empresas do Fortune 100</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 23:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalperspectiveblog.com/?p=393#comment-6406</guid>
		<description>[...] 100 empresas, 54% usam o Twitter para interagir com seus públicos. De acordo com Erin Byrne, Chief Digital Strategist da Burson-Marsteller, desse total, 94% das empresas usam suas contas no [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 100 empresas, 54% usam o Twitter para interagir com seus públicos. De acordo com Erin Byrne, Chief Digital Strategist da Burson-Marsteller, desse total, 94% das empresas usam suas contas no [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
